Skip to main content

Femoroacetabular Impingement

Load-bearing, training overuse, and post-traumatic mechanisms driving femoroacetabular impingement and hip osteoarthritis in service members.

38 CFR diagnostic codes 5250, 5251, 5252, 5253, 5254, 5255

Peer-reviewed evidence · 8 studies

Every one links to its record

  • Scher DL, Belmont PJ Jr, Mountcastle S, Owens BD. The incidence of primary hip osteoarthritis in active duty US military servicemembers. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(4):468-75. PMID:19333991. doi:10.1002/art.24429.

  • Williams TR, Puckett ML, Denison G, Shin AY, Gorman JD. Acetabular stress fractures in military endurance athletes and recruits: incidence and MRI and scintigraphic findings. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31(5):277-81. PMID:11981604. doi:10.1007/s00256-002-0485-0.

  • Kuhn KM, Riccio AI, Saldua NS, Cassidy J. Acetabular retroversion in military recruits with femoral neck stress fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(3):846-51. PMID:19588210. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0969-5.

Key facts

Diagnostic codes
5250, 5251, 5252, 5253, 5254, 5255
Verified studies
8
Legal theories
Direct (§ 3.303)

Peer-reviewed evidence (8)

The verified studies behind a Femoroacetabular Impingement claim — each links to its real PubMed or DOI record. These are sources our nexus drafts can draw from; none are invented.

  1. Scher DL, Belmont PJ Jr, Mountcastle S, Owens BD. The incidence of primary hip osteoarthritis in active duty US military servicemembers. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(4):468-75. PMID:19333991. doi:10.1002/art.24429.
  2. Williams TR, Puckett ML, Denison G, Shin AY, Gorman JD. Acetabular stress fractures in military endurance athletes and recruits: incidence and MRI and scintigraphic findings. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31(5):277-81. PMID:11981604. doi:10.1007/s00256-002-0485-0.
  3. Kuhn KM, Riccio AI, Saldua NS, Cassidy J. Acetabular retroversion in military recruits with femoral neck stress fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(3):846-51. PMID:19588210. doi:10.1007/s11999-009-0969-5.
  4. Barkley C, Wong WK, Knapik JJ, Westrick RB. The Presence of Hip Joint Effusion on MRI Is Predictive of a Grade 4 Femoral Neck Stress Injury. Mil Med. 2023;188(7-8):e1828-e1834. PMID:36611263. doi:10.1093/milmed/usac347.
  5. Jorgensen AY, Waterman BR, Hsiao MS, Belmont PJ. Functional outcomes of hip arthroplasty in active duty military service members. J Surg Orthop Adv. 2013;22(1):16-22. PMID:23449050. doi:10.3113/jsoa.2013.0016.
  6. Thomas DD, Bernhardson AS, Bernstein E, Dewing CB. Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement in a Military Population. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(14):3298-3304. PMID:28937803. doi:10.1177/0363546517726984.
  7. Jochimsen KN, Jacobs CA, Duncan ST. Femoroacetabular impingement is more common in military veterans with end-stage hip osteoarthritis than civilian patients: a retrospective case control study. Mil Med Res. 2019;6(1):27. PMID:31439033. doi:10.1186/s40779-019-0218-5.
  8. Hillery BL, Goldman AH, Velosky AG, Amoako MY, Leggit JC, Highland KB. Time to Total Hip Arthroplasty Among Patients in the US Military Health System. JAMA Netw Open. 2025;8(10):e2539971. PMID:41148135. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.39971.

Controlling law

The CFR sections and cases the theories relevant to this condition rest on — the legal standard raters evaluate against, never a prediction about any claim.

Direct (§ 3.303)

Regulation

  • 38 C.F.R. § 3.303

    Direct service connection — a current disability linked to service. (Continuity of symptomatology under § 3.303(b) is limited by case law to the § 3.309(a) chronic diseases — Walker.)

Case law

  • Shedden v. Principi, 381 F.3d 1163 (Fed. Cir. 2004)

    The three-element test: current disability, in-service event, and a nexus between them.

  • Holton v. Shinseki, 557 F.3d 1363 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

    Federal Circuit restatement of the same three direct-service-connection elements.

  • Caluza v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 498 (1995)

    The evidentiary framework a rater weighs each element against.

  • Walker v. Shinseki, 708 F.3d 1331 (Fed. Cir. 2013)

    Continuity of symptomatology (§ 3.303(b)) is available ONLY for a chronic disease listed in § 3.309(a); any other condition must use the medical-nexus pathway.

  • Davidson v. Shinseki, 581 F.3d 1313 (Fed. Cir. 2009)

    A categorical 'a medical opinion is always required for nexus' is legal error — competent lay evidence can suffice.

  • Jandreau v. Nicholson, 492 F.3d 1372 (Fed. Cir. 2007); Layno v. Brown, 6 Vet. App. 465 (1994)

    A veteran is competent to report symptoms they personally observe (Layno), and lay evidence can even establish a simple diagnosis in the right case (Jandreau).

  • McLendon v. Nicholson, 20 Vet. App. 79 (2006)

    A LOW threshold — evidence that merely indicates a nexus MAY exist obligates VA to provide a C&P exam.

  • 38 U.S.C. § 5107(b); Gilbert v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 49 (1990)

    When the evidence is in relative equipoise, the tie goes to the veteran — the preponderance must be AGAINST the claim to deny it.

Build your Femoroacetabular Impingement documentation

Generate and review your claim documents free — grounded in sources like these. When you want the nexus opinion signed, a licensed provider can review and sign it.

Educational information about the evidentiary standard — not legal or medical advice, and never a prediction about any claim.

If you're in crisis or thinking about suicide, you're not alone. The Veterans Crisis Line is free, confidential, and available 24/7 — you don't need to be enrolled in VA care.

© 2026 VA Claim Commander. All rights reserved. · Veteran Owned & Operated

VA Claim Commander LLC · 9301 State Highway 75 S #4, New Waverly, TX 77358

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Your records get HIPAA-aligned protection, and anything you choose to save is encrypted and stored under a signed HIPAA Business Associate Agreement (BAA) with AWS. We're a software tool — not a HIPAA covered entity — and your data is never sold or used to train AI models.

VA Claim Commander is a self-service software tool — not a VSO, law firm, or VA-accredited representative. It does not file, submit, present, or prosecute claims on anyone's behalf, and does not provide legal or medical advice. We recommend working with a free, VA-accredited VSO — find one near you.